Comments on: The Tragedy of the Commons: An Emerging Risk to the Entrepreneurial Society by Johan Roos https://www.druckerforum.org/blog/the-tragedy-of-the-commons-a-emerging-risk-to-the-entrepreneurial-society-by/ Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:45:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.3 By: José Antonio Vanderhorst Silverio, Ph.D. https://www.druckerforum.org/blog/the-tragedy-of-the-commons-a-emerging-risk-to-the-entrepreneurial-society-by/#comment-59242 Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:45:14 +0000 http://www.druckerforum.org/blog/?p=1339#comment-59242 The above comment is now part of the post “Is Drucker’s Management Challenges for the Systemic Civilization on the opposite side force field of academic privilege? ( http://grupomillenium.blogspot.com/2016/10/is-druckers-management-challenges-for.html ),”

]]>
By: José Antonio Vanderhorst Silverio, Ph.D. https://www.druckerforum.org/blog/the-tragedy-of-the-commons-a-emerging-risk-to-the-entrepreneurial-society-by/#comment-59213 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:55:26 +0000 http://www.druckerforum.org/blog/?p=1339#comment-59213 By reading a tweet of the Global Drucker Forum ‏(@GDruckerForum) that started with “’#Capitalism has a very dark side that’s upsetting the world order’ warns…” Johan Roos, it attracted my full attention. It did as I have been repeatedly trying to get a generative dialogue (not a debate) going on the difference between inclusive capitalism and great capitalism.

As far as we understand inclusive capitalism remains under the Cartesian mindset of the industrial civilization and its independent countries. Great capitalism let us leap under the systemic thinking mindset to the systemic civilization (more below) that needs to be created with interdependent countries.

We understand that inclusive capitalism leads to the said “very dark side” by operating in the saturated region of the industrial civilization experience curve. We explain next why great capitalism will help transform, transition, and develop the very bright side in the different experience curve of the systemic civilization where Peter Drucker’s entrepreneurial society readily fits to its high growth region.

Great capitalism is inspired and follows Jim Collins book “Good to Great,” from which we quote: “When used right, technology becomes an accelerator of momentum, not a creator of it” (162). Great companies refrained from adopting technology because it was trendy; each tool they chose to leverage was carefully selected. Disciplined thought and the clarity gained from a developed Hedgehog Concept, led good-to-great leaders to review what was truly relevant to their business, analyzing applications to deepen their understanding of its impact. In turn, pioneering strategies in the applications of technologies emerged.

We identified the problem with “very dark side” (good – for a few) capitalism is the ‘Groupthink” of the industrial civilization of independent countries, which generated what were called “wicked problems.” Those problems were identified at least in the early 1970s. From then on those problems, which we now identify as anti-systemic (not systemic which is in favor of systems – more below) problems have been escalating as the fourth information revolution (that Peter Drucker understood had a precedent in the third – printing press – information revolution) keeps emerging, but has not been allowed to help create the systemic civilization.

In other words, the “Emerging Risk to the Entrepreneurial Society” is in the industrial civilization saturated region under good capitalism by said ‘Groupthink,’ not in the systemic civilization under great capitalism. The main systems architecting difference between those civilizations is that of independent versus interdependent countries.

To address the two above mentioned ‘more below,’ we repeat a comment we wrote a month ago here in the GPDFBlog under the post “Brexit: Crisis and Opportunity – Nothing Lasts Unless Incessantly Renewed” by David Hurst

Can we say there is a “Waning Narrative of the G-20” 4-5 September 2016 meeting outcome?

• strengthening the G20 growth agenda
• pursuing innovative growth concepts and policies
• building an open world economy
• ensuring that economic growth benefits all countries and people

Some economists are now writing that Margaret Thatcher’s story about There Is No Alternative (TINA) to neoliberalism is wrong. It seems they want to keep over-expanding the industrial civilization.

I have reinterpreted W. Edwards Deming concept about (discrete) broken systems as being not systems but (a continuum) anti-systems. From that a story emerges the following:

Restricting ourselves to what Deming suggested about anti-systems in his book “The New Economics: for industry, government, education,” we will learn that a system has a future. Then Margaret Thatcher story is wrong by being the source to soaring inequality under Cartesian incremental innovation transition approaches. TINA as the shared story of our times that has led to widespread anti-systems based on the Old Economics. A new shared story that enable systemic radical innovations transformation approaches might be TIAF — There Is A Future – in the Systemic Civilization (please Google it).

]]>